At this moment, the case against the aforementioned Professors is pending. The case was brought about by Ms Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska, whose uncle is presented, in a fragment of the book as a participant in the murder of Jews, a man without conscience and honor. Mrs. Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska turned to our foundation for help in defending the honor of her uncle.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n RDI\u2019s actions regarding the book entitled \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d1,<\/sup> written by members of the Polish Center for Holocaust Research,as a section of the Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, and scientifically edited by Prof. Jan Grabowski<\/strong><\/p>\n The publicly heralded book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, edited by Prof. Jan Grabowski and Prof. Barbara Engelking (who, aside from other members of the Center for Holocaust Research, are also the authors of two chapters), was preceded by contradictory reviews in the public space. On the one hand, advocates of the \u201cNew Polish Holocaust Research School\u201d enthused about \u201cfundamental discoveries\u201d made by the authors, while on the other hand enthusiasts of the integrity of historical studies emphasized a number of unreliable and selective pieces of information which were not based on source materials. On top of that, it is necessary to note the behavior of Prof. Grabowski with his \u201cattacks\u201d on his adversaries, which is, in my opinion, extraordinary in normal relations between researchers and their audience.After all, this is how we should call Prof. Grabowski\u2019s responses to his critics who pointed out the methodological mistakes of the work2<\/sup>. And this aroused our curiosity. Why would a professor attack the critics of his work so violently? Why would he call his opponents anti-Semites, homophobes and ignoramuses? Our curiosity has grounds as Prof. Jan Grabowski sued Reduta for publishing the \u201cStatement\u201d on his research methods in June 2017. We have the impression that Prof. Grabowski attempts to muffle substantive critic of his works, which stands in clear contradiction not only to academic tradition but also the freedom of scientific disputes (possibility of criticizing scientific research).<\/p>\n Appointment of the working team for the purposes of following Grabowski<\/strong><\/p>\n Therefore, I appointed Reduta\u2019s research team, whose tasks are to follow the authors of \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d in archives and to confront stories about Jewish people, included in the book, with sources which the authors of the book \u201cDalej jest noc. Losy \u017byd\u00f3w w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski\u201d [Dalej jest noc. Faith of Jews in selected districts of occupied Poland] refer to. We do not wish to determine whether the districts mentioned in the book correspond in terms of size to prewar administrative divisions (which was stressed by Tomasz Doma\u0144ski, and followed by the brutal response of Jan Grabowski, quoted in footnote 2)3<\/sup>. We just want to check if the source references to archival acts are credible. Briefly speaking: all we check is the basis for the methodology of scientific research, rudiments, that is, whether a quotation in the book, a source reference, matches the archival data. Whether information on events included in the book matches the sources and if these sources are entered in the footnotes. Whether quoting sources is complete or perhaps only some passages which support the thesis are chosen. After all, it is a scientific publication, funded by the National Science Center, and edited by prominent professors. Everything should be correct, but we were curious about what such a confrontation with sources would be like. I must admit that I was totally surprised.<\/p>\n We read the book carefully, trying to sort the events presented so that we could check the sources productively. Mostly, these were files with lawsuits against people who had been accused of collaboration with Germans in \u201cmurdering and harassing civilians and prisoners of war\u201d – the title of the Decree of the Polish Committee of National Liberation [PKWN] dated 31.08.1944 \u2013 these are the so-called \u201csierpni\u00f3wki\u201d4<\/sup>. The first criterion for case selection to be checked was the distance from Warsaw \u2013 Reduta is very limited in terms of human and financial resources, and therefore stories that took place close to Warsaw came first. A well-known case from W\u0119growo, presented in the book by Prof. Grabowski, and described by Mr. Rados\u0142aw J\u00f3\u017awiak \u2013 a local historian \u2013 seemed to be sufficiently explained and there was no point in reproducing this work. Especially as Mr. Rados\u0142aw J\u00f3\u017awiak questioned the topography of the town, presented in the memoirs of a Jewish survivor, and copied uncritically by Prof. Grabowski, which was falsified by Mr. J\u00f3\u017awiak who proved that Prof. Grabowski did not know the topography of the town, and thus his report was not credible.5<\/sup> The claim was that the Poles murdered Jews in W\u0119growo. In response to these accusations, Professor Grabowski declared (ina nutshell) that a \u201chistory teacher\u201d did not have knowledge of Holocaust studies, and for this reason his voice was irrelevant.<\/p>\n I decided to investigate cases described in the book, which had taken place in another place \u2013 in Podlasie, nearby Drohiczyn. This is partly due to its proximity and partly due to easy access to IPN files of court hearing from 1950. These are the cases of Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, born on 8\/15 December 1894, from Malinowo village, Grodzisk commune, Drohiczy\u0144ski district, Podlaskie province.<\/p>\n The fact that I give the name of Edward Malinowski\u2019s father is not only because it is given in the case files, on the file with ink inscriptions, but it is of paramount importance, as we will see in a moment.<\/p>\n How many Malinowskis are in Malinowo?<\/strong><\/p>\n In \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, on page 157, we can find the story of Estera Drogicka (as it later turned out, it is one of four of her last names):<\/p>\n \u201cHowever, Estera Drogicka (nee Siemiatycka), after losing her family [note number 396)], being in possession of documents purchased from a Belorussian woman, decided to leave for Prussia to work, and she was supported by the village leader of Malinowo, Edward Malinowski (he robbed her at that time) \u2013 and in December 1942 she moved to Rastenburg (K\u0119trzyn) to work as a domestic help in the German Fittkau family.<\/p>\n Not only did she meet her second husband there (a Pole who worked with her), but she also developed her commercial operations by sending Malinowski packages with items for sale. She visited him when she went on holiday, \u201cback home\u201d. She realized that he was co-guilty of the death of a few dozen Jews who were hiding in the forest and were turned in to the Germans; in spite of this, she gave false testimony to defend him during the trial after the war (note no. 397)\u201d6<\/sup>.<\/p>\n In note no. 396, we read as follows:<\/p>\n \u201cHer sister with children and Estera\u2019s son, after escaping from the ghetto in Drohiczyn, joined the large group of Jews in the forest. They were caught by Poles and taken to the military police station, to be eventually shot to death\u201d. This information derives from the trial of Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, from 1950.<\/p>\n While in note no. 397:<\/p>\n \u201cAIPN Bi, 403\/18, Files of criminal case of Edward Malinowski, Maria Wi\u015bniewska\u2019s testimony, k.43: >During German occupation I, as a Jew, was hiding in the forest, near Malinowo. Nobody wanted to take me home. I visited the village leader \u2013 Malinowski \u2013 who took me to his place. I was hiding in his barn for a couple of weeks and he fed me [\u2026]. At night his barn was full of Jewish people, Malinowski gave them food. I owe my life to Malinowski because he got Aryan documents for me and then, based on our arrangement, said I dodged forced labor. Back then I got arrested and sent to Germany. I came to Malinowo for my holiday. When Jews were murdered, I was in Germany. I just received a letter from Edward Malinowski who wrote that the forester had turned Jews in and that Jewish partisans had killed him for this<.Malinowski was acquitted.7<\/sup>\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n Let\u2019s focus on the very body of the text in question and the fact that there is no note which would refer to some facts presented therein. There is no note on the fate of E. Drogicka working in Germany (her stay at Fittkau\u2019s, trading with Malinowski, etc.), while note 397 which refers to the clause that Estera Drogicka realized that \u201che is <\/em>[Malinowski] co-guilty of the death of Jews<\/em>\u201d applies to Estera Drogicka\u2019s explanations made during Malinowski\u2019s trial in 1950, in which Malinowski was acquitted.<\/p>\n We had a look at the files. Our priority was to learn what the author of this chapter, Barbara Engelking, skipped in the quotation from Estera Drogicka\u2019s explanations, as there is a square bracket \u201c[…]\u201d in a certain place in the text of the book, suggesting that some content was omitted by the editors.<\/p>\n Yet we started from reading case files to find out why Edward Malinowski had been brought to trial.<\/p>\n A few people from Malinowo informed against him. In the denunciation to \u201cprosecutors by the District Court in Bia\u0142ystok\u201d, they wrote that Malinowski as a village leader had collaborated with Germans, harassed villagers, and robbed residents in cooperation with Germans. And that he reported to Germans about Jews hiding in the forest, near Malinowo. Germans came to the village and Malinowski took them to the hideout in which Jews were murdered, while Malinowski robbed a dead Jewish girl of her gold earrings. One of the informers was\u2026 Edward Malinowski. Does it mean Edward Malinowski informed against himself? He did not, the answer is simpler \u2013 in Malinowo there were at least two men called Edward Malinowski and a dozen men with the same last name (Malinowski). This means some other Edward Malinowski informed against Edward Malinowski \u2013 the plaintiff\u2019s paternal uncle. And this is crucial for the case we investigate.<\/p>\n When you read files of this case, you can see that the handwriting, sometimes practiced and sometimes less practiced, in black or blue ink, reveals the terrible reality of World War II, just like people from Malinowo, near Drohiczyn, remembered it six or seven years after the event that they had witnessed. As a result of accusations brought to the UB agency [Poland\u2019s communist-era secret police<\/em>], Edward Malinowski was placed under arrest. He was arrested in September 1949 and put into a detention facility in Bia\u0142ystok. The distance between Bia\u0142ystok and Malinowo is 80 km. Today, this requires you to drive for an hour and ten minutes to reach the destination. Back then it was a two- or three-day journey. Based on the case files, Edward Malinowski\u2019s family tried to somehow deal with the tragedy they faced. The lawyer they hired filed a petition to question witnesses of the defense \u2013 Jews rescued by Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, who helped them and risked his life. One of these people was Estera Drogicka (after the war she assumed a new name: Maria Wi\u015bniewska) whom I\u2019ve mentioned above. Malinowski\u2019s lawyer also called on Jews to testify: Lejba Prybut and Chuna Kap\u0142an, as ones whom Malinowski helped and hid. In the letter of Edward Malinowski\u2019s proxy to the court, there are the places of residence of these witnesses \u2013 Maria Wi\u015bniewska in Wrocaw, Lejba Prybut in Bia\u0142ystok, and Chuna Kap\u0142an in Warsaw. Therefore \u2013 after the turmoil of war, the front and Soviet administration of front-line areas, and then during the communist occupation of Poland \u2013 Edward Malinowski\u2019s family succeeded in finding these witnesses for the defense, pointing out their places of residence, and they testified on his behalf in the court. As a consequence, Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, was acquitted. The case files also include letters written by residents for the court to defend him \u2013 these are emotional texts demonstrating how much people owed him. One of the letters stated that, during his reign, nobody left the village to work \u201cin Prussia\u201d (except for Estera Drogicka aka Maria Wi\u015bniewska whose decision to go to work was part of her \u201csurvival strategy\u201d, which she mentioned herself), and the village leader also tried to get Germans drunk when they came to the village so that they did not persecute villagers.<\/p>\n The investigation and trial of Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, took place in 1949-1950 and ended with Edward being acquitted8<\/sup>. At the end of the court proceedings, the judge determined on the basis of witnesses\u2019 testimonies that Edward Malinowski had been unjustly accused of collaborating with Germans, informing against hiding Jews, and robbing the murdered Jewess. The group of witnesses, aside from the informers who partly withdrew their accusations, also included Jews, requested by the defense to testify, whom the defendant had helped during the occupation. We need to remember that five years after the end of the war everyone in Poland knew that helping Jews was tantamount to the death penalty. The court took into account testimonies in favor of Edward Malinowski made by Jews who came specifically for the trial from Bia\u0142ystok, Wroc\u0142aw and Warsaw. Their testimonies were minuted one after the other in the following order: Maria Wi\u015bniewska, Chuna Kap\u0142an and Lejba Prybut. Wi\u015bniewska\u2019s testimony was noted down on the sheet which can be found at the bottom of page 81 (scan of files), and continues on page 82, while the testimonies of the others can be found below, on sheets 82 and 83. The court also considered the testimonies of Polish residents of Malinowo, who claimed that Edward Malinowski had not been guilty of turning Jews in, but that he had helped them during the war.<\/p>\n In such a case, we need to ask a question as to why the author of the chapter, Prof. Barbara Engelking, and the book editor, Prof. Jan Grabowski, failed to mention testimonies proving that Edward Malinowski had not been guilty? Reading the testimonies of Estera Drogicka aka Maria Wi\u015bniewska, there was no way they did not see the testimonies of other Jews. It seems that such sources must not be omitted and, from the point of view of rules of research ethics, source studies methodology and academic tradition, not only Polish but also Canadian, such actions should have never taken place. Especially if you ascribe the most serious charge to a man – accomplice to murdering other people, and this man is a person who was supported by Jews themselves: \u201chis barn was full of Jews<\/em>\u201d (Drogicka aka Wi\u015bniewska) and \u201che gave me bread and pork fat<\/em>\u201d (Prybut), \u201che gave me bread and pork fat for free and warned us, the Jews, to stay silent<\/em>\u201d (Kaplan). Let me remind you \u2013 according to German law in occupied Poland, all these deeds entailed the death penalty not only to Malinowski, a village leader, but all his family, or perhaps even the entire village of Malinowo!<\/p>\n Thus, confronting the content of the chapter \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d by Prof. Barbara Engelking, edited by herself and Prof. Jan Grabowski, with source materials, we discovered that these authors, in our opinion, managed the sources in the following \u2013 disturbing to us \u2013 way:<\/p>\n 1) They skipped an important passage of the testimonies by Estera Drogicka aka Maria Wi\u015bniewska, supporting Edward Malinowski, who did not collect any money for hiding and feeding her (\u201c\u2026 although I did not have a red cent…\u201d) – <\/em>these words were replaced in the passage of the book with a square bracket \u201c[…]\u201d.<\/p>\n 2) They deleted Estera Drogicka\u2019s aka Maria Wi\u015bniewska\u2019s words from the testimony: \u201dIn 1945 the fiance of the girl whose earrings were taken by Malinowski said that Malinowski had returned these earrings to him, and praised him<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n 3) They skipped\/omitted testimonies of other Jews: Lejba Prybut and Chuna Kap\u0142an, which proved Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, had helped Jews during the occupation and that it was a forester who informed about Jews hiding in the forest, and that Malinowski had returned earrings to the fiance of the murdered Jewess.<\/p>\n 4) There were no notes showing that Estera Drogicka aka Maria Wi\u015bniewska was in Rastenburg \u2013 there was also no reference to sources describing her experiences at work: meeting a husband there, trading with Edward Malinowski, getting robbed by him \u2013 as the author writes in the body of the text.<\/p>\n 5) There was no information suggesting that Estera Drogicka aka Maria Wi\u015bniewska was a so-called \u201cearwitness\u201d, that she was not in Malinowo when Jews were murdered \u2013 as opposed to the witnesses: Kaplan and Prybut and numerous Polish witnesses, villagers who directly witnessed the event that took place in the forest, near Malinowo.<\/p>\n We were wondering about the grounds for declaring Malinowski\u2019s guilt by the author of the chapter in the book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, in which this story is described. Both she and the editor are professors with a considerable oeuvre related to the Holocaust. Also, when it comes to the description of the stay of Maria Wi\u015bniewska aka Estera Drogicka in Rastenburg in the workplace, the author fails to give any sources in the notes, the description of events is somehow \u201csuspended in the air\u201d – our thinking was that the author either knew something else, or found the source of information on this matter, but for unknown reasons to us failed to mention this source in the footnote or body of the text.<\/p>\n All of this seemed very mysterious and, in my view, at variance with what I learned in the Faculty of History at the University of Warsaw, where I studied in the years 1984-1991. It is also the place where Prof. Grabowski at that time, in the same faculty and the same MA seminar, learned the basics of historical studies methodology, so our skills in this respect are the same, and it does not matter that he has been dealing with the Holocaust for 20 years and I am a columnist and founder of Reduta Dobrego Imienia. The principles of scientific studies have not changed, unless studying the Holocaust adopts some other methodology which I have no idea about.<\/p>\n Analyzing all of this, I asked further questions: was it a scientific book? Who accepted this book for print, who wrote the review and on what basis was the grant of 522,000 zlotys assigned to this research project settled?<\/p>\n The observation concerning the methodological techniques in the work presented by \u2013 in fact \u2013 renowned scientists encouraged us to check if the information provided by Drogicka\/Wi\u015bniewska and other Jewish witnesses could be probable in terms of topography of the surrounding area. Our goal was to find traces of the events and find Edward Malinowski\u2019s family to listen to their report on the events. It was important because the case files suggested that the wife and younger son of Edward Malinowski had been arrested and sentenced in 1949 for contacting the anti-Nazi underground resistance movement, that is, the local post-AK [the Home Army] unit led by Czes\u0142aw Pilecki \u201cJask\u00f3\u0142ka\u201d.<\/p>\n Since Edward Malinowski\u2019s family kept in touch with such an underground movement, the Cursed Soldiers, in 1949, it means they had to be somehow related to the Home Army [AK] or other underground organizations during World War II. The fact that Malinowski\u2019s family kept in touch with Jask\u00f3\u0142ka\u2019s patrol at the time when post-AK conspiracy was virtually destroyed by the UB meant that they had to be trusted by the soldiers and leader of this unit, they had to be familiar, after all Jask\u00f3\u0142ka must have expected UB provocation.<\/p>\n For the case in question, it is important that we assess the conduct of Edward Malinowski during German occupation. If he was affiliated with the Home Army or civil structure of the Polish Underground State, his deeds \u2013 helping Jews, hiding them, protecting villagers against being taken for work – must be considered not only in the context of humanity and kindness of heart, but also the civil conduct of a solider and citizen serving his homeland. When we realized this, we were even more motivated to discover the truth about Edward Malinowski. Accusing a man 75 years after the war, a man who was found not guilty in court, of collaboration with Germans and being an accomplice to the murder of Jews (after all, this is how we think the following clause should be understood: \u201che was co-guilty of the death of Jews<\/em>\u201d from the text by Prof. Barbara Engelking, edited by Prof. Jan Grabowski) is another destruction of honor of the man who served his homeland well.<\/p>\n Malinowo village is located a dozen kilometers from Drohiczyn, in Dziadkowice parish, where a parish church is situated. The parish was founded in 1451. These are noble \u201clands\u201d, while Malinowo is an impoverished place. Scattered on flat fields, it is not a typical street village. There are roads which cross, households are separated from one another. There is a forest nearby, and simultaneously the place of tragedy of Jews hiding in \u201cbunkers\u201d took place in 1943. They were turned in by P\u00f3\u0142torak, a forester, from the nearby village of Czarna Wielka. Dwellers of the first house which we visited when coming to Malinowo, when asked about Edward Malinowski, showed us the way to the Leszczy\u0144ski household. It turned out that Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska, Edward Malinowski\u2019s niece, was living there along with her son and his family. As the village is spread over fields, the buildings of this household are separated from other buildings and, although the topography after the war could have changed over 75 years, it was clear that this place was suitable for hiding Jews: away from other buildings, by a side road. Meeting the Leszczy\u0144ski family was somehow very moving. On the one hand, they were farmers with a dairy farm, but on the other you could tell this family had its traditions, had books in the bookcase and talking to them suggested a deeper cultural background than it may seem at first sight.<\/p>\n Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska is 80 years old and remembers her paternal uncle and father well, who as it turned out volunteered to go to the Polish-Soviet War in 1919 and became corporals in the CKM campaign. As she says \u201ctogether with General \u017beligowski, they reached as far as Smole\u0144sk<\/em>\u201d. The household of Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska\u2019s father neighbored the household of his brother \u2013 Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, who the Germans nominated as a village leader during the German occupation, in place of Adolf Malinowski who had a son Edward Malinowski.<\/p>\n As we can see, in 1943, Malinowo, at the time of the events described in \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, had a population of at least 4 Malinowskis: the village leader Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, born in 1895, Edward Malinowski, son of Adolf, born in 1920, Adolf Malinowski, a former village leader, Edmund Malinowski, and Franciszek Malinowski. This results from the conversation with Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska and the case files of Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw. Now we can see why the father\u2019s first name is so important in the context of describing the story of Edward Malinowski. Based on the report of Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska, we learned that the denunciation against Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, resulted from an inveterate feud dating back to times before the war. As the Malinowski family was wealthier than other villagers during the first Soviet occupation, they were closely monitored by Soviet snoopers and probably the only reason why they were not exiled to Siberia was because the Germans invaded Soviet lands in June 1941. When the Nazis murdered Jews in Malinowo, Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska was 3 years old, but her family and villagers have kept those events in mind, which can be proved by the file case from 1950 \u2013 both in the testimonies of surviving Jews (Drogicka, Prybut, Kap\u0142an), and testifying village residents: Germans came to the village in winter 1943, entered Edward Malinowski\u2019s, son of Stanis\u0142aw, household and told him to call people with shovels, he appointed a few men, including Edward Malinowski, son of Adolf. The Germans told him to call a forester from Czerna, located a few kilometers from there. The forester did not appear upon first request because he was probably on a round. Eventually, when he came, the Germans talked to him in private and told everyone to go to the forest, where the forester from Czerna pointed out the Jews\u2019 hideout. The Germans started chasing the Jews away, while the men with shovels, including two Edward Malinowskis, stayed at the border of the forest in the snow-covered field. The Germans in turn gathered Jews and told them to undress and then shot them to death. As it was about to get dark, the Nazis told them to bury the dead on the following day. Back then, during the burial, Edward Malinowski, a village leader and son of Stanis\u0142aw, took gold earrings from the body of a dead Jewess, and later returned them to her fiance, according to the testimony of Prybut, Drogicka and Kap\u0142an. He took them not only because they were a souvenir for the Jew but also a valuable item which could be used for further hiding.<\/p>\n What happened in 1943 in Malinowo \u2013 \u201cextermination as part of hunting down Jews\u201d \u2013 after liquidation of the ghetto in Drohiczyn was one of many crimes in this area made by Germans with the sanction of the German law introduced in the occupied Poland. The aforesaid law was carefully described by Prof. Bogdan Musia\u0142 in his book entitled \u201cKto dopomo\u017ce \u017bydowi\u2026\u201d [Who can help a Jew…<\/em>]9<\/sup>. According to this law, helping Jews in any way in 1943 entailed the death penalty, as did refusal to participate in such actions as described above in Malinowo. Following this law, the village leader was a hostage. If Jews, partisans, or weapons had been found in the village, or if someone had opposed the Nazis, the village leader would have been shot to death in the first place.<\/p>\n The analysis of events from Malinowo demonstrates that Germans had learned from someone, probably from the forester from Czerna, about the Jews\u2019 hideout in the forest, near Malinowo, before they came to the village \u2013 this can be proved by the order to call in the forester from Czerna. It was the forester who turned the Jews in and probably informed the Germans about their stay in his forest. In the aftermath of these events, the forester from Czerna was killed by partisans. One of the testimonies points to \u201cJewish partisans\u201d.<\/p>\n We asked the Malinowski family about a series of events referred to in the case files from 1950. Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska told us that her paternal uncle\u2019s wife, Maria Malinowska, and son Tadeusz were imprisoned for contacting Czes\u0142aw Jask\u00f3\u0142ska\u2019s unit and stayed behind bars in Bia\u0142ystok. Tadeusz Malinowski, son of Edward, was 15 years old at that time and, as the family mentions, the tortures he suffered in the UB prison (solitary confinement with cold water, standing for long hours, sleep deprivation) stunted his growth, he was always a short man. The Malinowskis were persecuted for the entire post-war period, until the times of the III Republic of Poland \u2013 they experienced theft, home invasions, prevention of education, surtaxes, and quotas, etc.<\/p>\n When we entered the house of Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska, Edward Malinowski\u2019s niece, we had the impression that our arrival was some sort of emergence of a piece of free Poland in their house, because public accusations of crimes and collaboration with Germans were a source of additional suffering to them. Not only was the family persecuted by communists, but also the burden imposed on them by the authors of the book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, being so unjust in the light of their knowledge, was unbearable to them. Therefore, they asked Reduta to support them in the fight against defamation of their family. Listening to Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska\u2019s reports on the whereabouts of the family, her father and paternal uncle, confronting this with the source material available in IPN, we realized that we were dealing with a patriotic Polish family with traditions of fighting for freedom, fighting against communism, fighting which was possible during the war and in the post-war period. Aside from the fact that Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw and village leader, hid Jews and helped them during the German occupation, he also hid Lieutenant Kazimierz Krasowski, nicknamed G\u0142uszec, in the same buildings, who during the provocation of the so-called \u201cV Command WiN\u201d was lured out from his hideout at the Malinowskis\u2019 and murdered in Bia\u0142ystok in December 1954, after a fictional trial. Based on the family\u2019s reports, they also hid an anonymous colonel (either AK or NSZ). On 16 September 1949, Henryk Malinowski, son of the Edward Malinowski who was a village leader, as a student of the Warsaw University of Technology, and his colleagues from the underground movement went to Gda\u0144sk with tickets for the Gda\u0144sk to Katowice flight and highjacked the airplane shortly after takeoff, forcing it to fly to Sweden. It was a sensational event in Sweden, yet the Swedish authorities did not publish the identities of the highjackers because it was obvious that they were Polish anti-communist partisans. Henryk Malinowski graduated from the University of Technology in Sweden with an engineer\u2019s degree, and from the 1970s was the head of the Polish Emigration Council in Sweden \u2013 the oldest and most important Polish organization in Sweden10<\/sup>. Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, when acquitted and released from prison, moved to Warsaw, often visiting his family lands.<\/p>\n This is why I decided to support Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska in her fight for the good name of her paternal uncle. Not only because the publication edited by Prof. Jan Grabowski and Prof. Barbara Engelking files such serious charges against a Polish hero and affects his reputation, but also because, in our view, this case may be a model example of the careless use of historical sources, which may translate into the damage to the reputation not only of Edward Malinowski, but also other Poles, or even Poland. Are these actions aimed at making Poles at least co-guilty of the Holocaust, or perhaps there is some other reason behind it?<\/p>\n As a consequence of detecting these methodological mistakes and vague origins of the information on the stay of Estera Drogicka\/Maria Wi\u015bniewska in Rastenburg and her experiences after leaving Malinowo, we decided to find these sources. Even a rough check let us learn that there were a few places with reports and memories of the survivors of the Holocaust \u2013 Yad Vashem, the Shoah Foundation, the United States Holocaust Museum. Searching was ongoing – our volunteers in New York and Stockholm and Reduta\u2019s employees in Warsaw listened to dozens of recordings of Holocaust survivors, yet in vain. Importantly, these recordings are not available online and cannot be copied in the reading room of the institution that gives access to them, e.g. in Polin Museum. We couldn\u2019t find the recording, memories of Estera Drogicka\/Maria Wi\u015bniewska or Maria Bujalska \u2013 we also found such a name in the IPN archives. We found it by chance: a journalist of the liberal Gazeta Wyborcza sent us an inquiry about the lawsuit against Grabowski and Engelking which we had filed in the meantime. What we had already found \u2013 confrontation of text from the book with the content of files – was highly interesting and sufficient to file a lawsuit. The GW journalist wrote an e-mail with the following questions:<\/p>\n Dear Sir, <\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em>With reference to our SMS correspondence, I am sending you my questions: <\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Question number 5 drew my attention. We quickly did some research and it actually turned that Maria Wiltgren\u2019s recording was in USHMM. Our volunteers in Stockholm listened to it and made notes \u2013 it was our Estera Drogicka aka Maria Wi\u015bniewska aka Maria Bujalska, who was now called Maria Wiltgrem. I decided to answer the GW journalist. Here is my reply:<\/p>\n Dear Editor, <\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em>See below to find answers to your questions. Before you write a text, please have a close look at the testimonies of witnesses from 1949 concerning the history of Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw (hereinafter called the VILLAGE LEADER), <\/strong>and listen to the entire recording of the talk with Maria Wiltgren (aka Estera Drogicka aka Maria Wi\u015bniewska) from 1996. The fact that the VILLAGE LEADER helped Jews was also discussed by other Jews whom he had saved and Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska, his niece. We believe the testimonies made by Mrs. Estera Drogicka from 1949 because they are in harmony with the testimonies of many other witnesses and confirm that the VILLAGE LEADER Malinowski helped the Jewish People, Poles and Russians at the time of the war. We need to emphasize the fact that Maria Wiltgren (i.e. Drogicka) was not in Malinowo in 1943, when the Jews hiding in the forest were revealed (18-22 persons according to various sources). Back then, she was in K\u0119trzyn and she learned the story of the killed Jews in the forest near Malinowo probably from\u2026 Edward Malinowski, son of Adolf(!). <\/strong>We need to highlight, which also arises from the case files of the VILLAGE LEADER, that there were two Edward Malinowskis in Malinowo. One of them was the son of Adolf Malinowski, and the other of Stanis\u0142aw. What is equally important, Adolf Malinowski was the previous village leader in Malinowo. (\u2026) Based on the words of Edward \u2013 son of Adolf \u2013 Estera Drogicka knew how Jews died (however, she did not include any details in her report, perhaps she did not know them). And it was this Edward (son of Adolf) \u2013 as the report suggests – whom Estera Drogicka corresponded with during her stay in K\u0119trzyn. Maria Wiltgren (Estera Drogicka) returned to Malinowo only in 1944 for her holiday. Back then she stayed at the home of Edward Malinowski, Adolf\u2019s son.<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0How can therefore the authors of \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d be so sure that it was the village leader Malinowski who \u201cwas co-guilty of the death of a few dozen Jews\u201d? <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Following Estera Drogicka\u2019s account from 1996, it was not so obvious, in my estimation. Why did the researchers, writing a book, enter the note referring to the trial of Malinowski and accusation of 1949 with the testimony of Wiltgren (Estera Drogicka), but they failed to enter the recording with Maria Wiltgren from 1996 as a source for the description of her experiences? (\u2026.) What was the researchers\u2019 intention when they failed to show the source to the report of the survivor from 1996? Did they intend to adapt this event to their research thesis, or perhaps there were some other reasons? Why did they omit the fact that the case files of the VILLAGE LEADER Edward Malinowski contained the explanations of several witnesses \u2013 surviving Jews and Poles \u2013 who, similarly to Estera Drogicka, claimed that the forester had turned the Jews in, while the VILLAGE LEADER Edward Malinowski (son of Stanis\u0142aw) had hidden Jews and helped them? What was the purpose of omitting such significant facts in the face of such a serious accusation of the VILLAGE LEADER Edward Malinowski of being an accomplice to the murder of Jews? Why are such crucial facts skipped, after all, they oppose the thesis that it was Poles who murdered Jews? The case files from 1949 show there were many Malinowskis from Malinowo. Would a competent researcher combine various stories and persons freely, without learning the truth? Can you accuse the dead of non-committed crimes by skipping certain sources from the times where witnesses better remember what actually happened (which is obvious), and simultaneously base on the testimony made nearly 50 years after the events, the testimony that holds that Estera Drogicka talked about two different Edwards Malinowskis? We deal with two statements made by Maria Wiltgren (court testimony from 1949 and video recording from 1996). And we can also access the testimonies of a few dozen other persons, in favor of the VILLAGE LEADER Malinowski. In \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, the authors omitted these passages which might defend the Pole \u2013 the VILLAGE LEADER Malinowski. And they described the story of Maria Wiltgren (aka Estera Drogicka) so that the aforesaid story \u2013 in my opinion \u2013 matched their research thesis. <\/em><\/p>\n Additionally, the information confirming the innocence of the VILLAGE LEADER Edward Malinowski is hidden in the footnotes and cannot be easily found by readers \u2013 as opposed to the statement on the VILLAGE LEADER Edward Malinowski \u201cbeing co-guilty\u201d of the murder of Jews. Besides this, Barbara Engelking and Jan Grabowski failed to demonstrate the following in the book or note:<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0– any reports of other Jewish and Polish survivors who claimed that the VILLAGE LEADER Malinowski was innocent (other Jews and Poles also communicated the same message as in the testimonies made by Estera Drogicka) <\/em><\/p>\n – the VILLAGE LEADER Edward Malinowski also helped people, thanks to which nobody from Malinowo village went to Germany for forced labor (except for one person who volunteered \u2013 there are testimonies confirming it in the case files) <\/em><\/p>\n – the VILLAGE LEADER was an honest, righteous and highly-regarded man \u2013 the case files include a few letters to court signed by residents of Malinowo confirming his honesty and proving that the Jews killed in the forest near Malinowo were turned in by the forester.<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0All of this \u2013 in my opinion \u2013 demonstrates the selective adoption of sources, so that it is possible to put the blame on Edward Malinowski in the passage of the book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, contrary to facts and with the omission of the critical rules of research work of a historian. This is how we evaluate these actions.<\/em><\/p>\n ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS: <\/em><\/p>\n Was it Reduta Dobrego Imienia that contacted Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska or Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska that contacted Reduta Dobrego Imienia with regard to the passage of the book edited by Barbara Engelking and Jan Grabowski „Dalej jest noc” dedicated to the coverage of Maria Wiltgren (formerly Wi\u015bniewska) aka Estera Drogicka about the paternal uncle of Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska, Edward Malinowski? Reduta Dobrego Imienia contacted Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska due to one of our research projects. Filomena was outraged about how her paternal uncle was treated and presented a series of proofs invalidating the thesis from the book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d on her paternal uncle. Edward Malinowski, Mrs. Leszczy\u0144ska\u2019s paternal uncle, was a hero who saved people during the war, regardless of their nationality (Jews, Russians and Poles), which can be confirmed through testimonies not only made by Estera Drogicka, but also two other Jewish survivors and a few dozen Polish people. It is further supported by the verdict of the court which acquitted Edward Malinowski.<\/em><\/p>\n Did you instigate the lawsuit? The plaintiff in this case is Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska who wanted to bring a lawsuit for the violation of her personal rights. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n How would you, as Reduta Dobrego Imienia, define your role in this matter? Reduta Dobrego Imienia \u2013 the Polish League against Defamation – is a foundation whose primary goal is to initiate and support actions aimed at clarifying untrue information in the media on the history of Poland, and in particular the course of World War II, participation of Poles in the war, relations between Poles and the Jewish Nation, and on German concentration camps. It also aims to propagate knowledge of the history and culture of Poland, and present times in Poland, counteracting racism and xenophobia, against Poles and citizens of the Republic of Poland, irrespective of origin, to develop and strengthen attitudes towards active cooperation in the growth of the civic society. These goals can be achieved through the following actions: monitoring media in order to detect the defamation of Poland and Polish people, undertaking legal actions against persons, organizations and institutions which and\/or who defame Poland and its citizens, organizing public events, such as pickets, demonstrations, marches, rallies, concerts, fairs, and fests in accordance with the rules of local law in order to protest against the defamation of Poland and the Polish Nation, performing educational, editing and research operations. Reduta Dobrego Imienia defends the reputation of Poland and Polish people. Regarding Edward Malinowski, I believe that we are dealing with several disturbing actions. On the one hand, we can identify deletion \u2013 in the scientific book \u2013 of passages from the testimonies of Estera Drogicka, which confirm that Mr. Malinowski helped her for free, just to present him in a negative light. On the other hand, the work does not give any relevant information pointing out the testimonies of other Jewish and Polish witnesses who would confirm that Edward Malinowski had rescued Jews. I personally think that such an action was not an accident. It also means that such presentation of Edward Malinowski is surely an illegal violation of the good image of a Pole who supported people during the German occupation and omnipresent German terror.<\/em><\/p>\n Why are you supposed to be a witness? <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n I will tell the court about how we discovered untrue information in the book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d and about the negative impact of these slanders on the life of Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska, and how it translates into the reputation of Poland. <\/em><\/p>\n Do you negate the words of the Survivor, Maria Wiltgren aka Estera Drogicka? We rely, among others, on the testimony of Estera Drogicka from the trial from 1949, when she said that Edward Malinowski had saved her and helped her. We accuse the authors of the book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d of the intentional omission of parts of the testimonies of this witness, e.g. about the fact that Edward Malinowski had saved her for free. The information included in the testimonies made by Estera Drogicka can be found in the testimonies filed before court by two Jews saved by Edward Malinowski and a few dozen Poles. Do you think Edward Malinowski did not turn the Jews in and did not rob Maria Wilgren aka Estera Drogicka? The survivor talked about it in the recording from 1996 for the Shoah Foundation. Are you familiar with it? For me, you cannot just be selective in the face of a set of all documents (including statutory documents \u2013 case files, witnesses\u2019 testimonies made directly after the event and the statement made 50 years after the event) and pick these passages which match the research thesis, stating that Polish people murdered Jews and then present the untrue story of a Pole, Edward Malinowski. We believe this is how the authors behaved. You cannot just copy testimonies and delete the parts which support Edward Malinowski. You cannot FAIL TO mention that a few dozen witnesses confirmed before the court that Edward Malinowski had saved Jews. YOU JUST CANNOT FAIL TO MENTION THE TESTIMONIES OF THE JEWS THEMSELVES (ASIDE FROM DROGICKA) WHO SAID THAT MALINOWSKI HAD HELPED THEM AND CONFIRMED HIS HONESTY. A reliable scientific researcher must present readers with various aspects of the matter. The book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, and more specifically its passage about the story of Estera Drogicka, depicts only such sources which support the research thesis of the researcher. A reliable researcher is obligated to show the sources which oppose the thesis too. This is how research studies become reliable. Here we are talking about very serious accusations against the VILLAGE LEADER Edward Malinowski \u2013 being an accomplice to the murder of Jews. I think that it was the author\u2019s intention to add this story to the book in such a way. And the effect of this is that Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska, an old lady, and Edward Malinowski\u2019s family unfairly suffer. <\/em><\/p>\n What does the demand presented in the lawsuit mean, the one concerned with the statement that the purpose of the authors of \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d was to accuse Poles of murdering Jews? There is no such demand in the lawsuit. In the lawsuit, Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska demands rectification and apologies for the untrue accusation of her Polish paternal uncle, Edward Malinowski, and for the deliberate attachment of the manipulated story to the thesis holding that Polish people murdered Jews. <\/em><\/p>\n Dear Editor, <\/em><\/p>\n Now, as you already know everything, are you going to publish explanations fully, are you going to investigate this case comprehensively or perhaps you are going to pick only those sentences which match the initial thesis of the article? Please send authorization. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail with responses to the questions asked in your message. <\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em>Yours faithfully <\/em><\/p>\n Maciej \u015awirski Head of Reduta Dobrego Imienia12<\/sup><\/em><\/p>\n We got down to work. It turned out that, in the recording from 1996, Estera Drogicka (let\u2019s stick to her first family name) mentioned war events happening after the outbreak of war. The recording of over two hours contains many details from her life \u2013 and this biography again differs from the ones we analyzed before. It gives an insight into experiences during the Soviet occupation in the years 1939-1941. She spoke about the period of German occupation, which we were interested in the most, when she went to Malinowo and then to Rastenburg, in a very critical way in relation to Polish people but \u2013 in our opinion \u2013 Estera Drogicka did not actually say that it was Edward Malinowski who had informed about Jews hiding in the forest, near Malinowo. Her story involves a few people whose differentiation proved to be key to our story.<\/p>\n The story behind the files from IPN and testimonies made before court in 1950 by Estera Drogicka and the testimony of Estera Drogicka\/Maria Wiltgren made in 1996 is as follows:<\/p>\n son of Adolf), and Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw. The last Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, was the Malinowo village leader during World War II.<\/p>\n Working on this case, we found Estera Drogicka\u2019s employee records. It turned out that, after World War II, Estera Drogicka applied for a position of educator\/teacher for UB (communist secret political police) workers\u2019 children and was eventually employed. In IPN we accessed the file \u201cPersonal files of UB civil worker: Wi\u015bniewska, nee Siemiatycka Maria, father\u2019s name: Jankiel, date of birth: 18-02-1917\u201d. In 1947 Estera Drogicka\/Maria Wi\u015bniewska\/Maria Wiltgren concluded a job agreement with the Secret Political Police [UB] \u2013 educator in holiday camps for children of W.U.B.P (Provincial Public Security Office) employees.14<\/sup> For this reason, she had to submit a CV which was different than the CV described in the report from 1996. The discrepancies concern the death of her siblings and father, also the description of works in Germany is slightly different. Whereas the CV presented in 1946 holds that her siblings and father died in the German concentration camp in Treblinka, the CV from 1996 states that her father was killed by Polish people and her sister was convinced by a Pole to go to the military police, where she was murdered (shot to death).<\/p>\n The discovery of sources regarding her fate depicted in the passage of the book made us aware of why Prof. Barbara Engelking failed to add the source note in the book about it. First of all \u2013 we think she would have to mention (found shameful by many) the episode in the life of the Survivor, that is work for UB. Secondly \u2013 she would have to address the matter of the existence of several Malinowskis and differentiate between Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw, a person whom she claimed had informed against Jews, and Edward Malinowski, son of Adolf, younger than his namesake by 25 years, who traded with Drogicka. We do not know what made the author do it (lack of comprehensive investigation of the matter, ill will to present a Pole as guilty of the crime or something else). Whatever it was, we hold the opinion that \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d (at least the part concerning Malinowski) should not be considered as a scientific work conducted in a reliable way. In addition, the combination of several Malinowskis into one helped her present the village leader Edward Malinowski as guilty of informing against Jews \u2013 it is exactly to support the thesis on Polish people\u2019s fault for murdering Jews during the occupation, presenting Edward Malinowski as a ruthless and sly person (at first he robbed Estera Drogicka and then had no scruples and traded with her).<\/p>\n We therefore need to ask very specific questions:<\/p>\n – Who reviewed the book entitled \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d? There is no note on reviewers on the editor\u2019s website.<\/p>\n – What happened so that the grant for this book was settled successfully in the National Science Center?<\/p>\n – How are grants in NSC settled since a book which contains such significant methodological mistakes, in our view disqualifying its value as a scientific work, was settled successfully?<\/p>\n Conclusions <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Our archival studies, analysis and confrontation with sources of the half-page passage of the book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d by Prof. Barbara Engelking, edited by Prof. Jan Grabowski, resulted in the identification of \u201cmethodological mistakes\u201d, as we openly call actions taken by Barbara Engelking.<\/p>\n Unfortunately, we must assume that the \u201cmethodological mistakes\u201d are by no means an accident, but the method intentionally adopted by the group surrounding Prof. Jan Grabowski. We need to ask a question: what is the purpose of such conduct? In our view, we do not deal with \u201cscientific work\u201d in the broader sense, whose freedom is guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, but some sort of \u201ccargo cult\u201d in science15<\/sup>, negligence in the researching or even some kind of intentional mess in research methodology leading to disinformation \u2013 sensu stricto.<\/p>\n The lawsuit against Prof. Jan Grabowski and Prof. Barbara Engelking is ongoing. There have already been hearings during which witnesses were questioned, including me with regard to the discovered facts concerning the omission of some sources and failure to add a note on facts from Estera Drogicka\u2019s life after her departure to work in Germany, which in turn let us discover that Barbara Engelking and scientific editor Jan Grabowski combined 2 or maybe even 3 various Edwards Malinowskis into one person. In our estimation, such actions are at variance with the basic rules of edition and analysis of sources, and as a consequence defame Edward Malinowski in the book \u201cDalej jest noc\u201d, under the scientific supervision of Jan Grabowski.<\/p>\n The reaction of J. Grabowski and B. Engelking to the lawsuit filed on behalf of Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska is interesting. In one of the lawsuit documents, they admitted to combining a few Malinowskis into one person, while their proxy said it had been a \u201cmistake\u201d which, however, did not matter and such a mistake did not offend Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska. The defendants want to defend themselves in a way that the claim is dismissed due to the non-existence of the right of action of the plaintiff \u2013 the non-existence of personal rights in the form of the right to honor ancestors and the right to a good name. In reality, the existence of these rights was confirmed by way of legally binding verdicts in 4 other cases which Reduta won. The basis of the dispute is not historical truth, but the fact that methodological mistakes (skipping and failure to give essential sources) led to defamation of the memory of Filomena Leszczy\u0144ska\u2019s ancestor. In historical science, an attempt to learn the truth is based on reliable analysis of sources and correct, from the point of view of logic, conclusions, ensuring research integrity.<\/p>\n Based on the analysis of the stance of the defendants, we can also conclude that the defendants not only fail to appreciate the methodological mistakes we have pointed out, but also \u2013 at least I guess so \u2013 resort to attacking us in the media to \u201ccover\u201d the unfavorable impression made by the disclosure of their research methodology concerning Edward Malinowski to the general public. I understand that the letter posted on websites of the University of Ottawa is one of the elements of such a media game.<\/p>\n Maciej \u015awirski<\/p>\n Head of Reduta Dobrego Imienia<\/p>\n Attachments: Scans of the sheets from the case files of the village leader Edward Malinowski: denunciation to the prosecutor\u2019s office, verdict sentence, testimonies of Maria Wi\u015bniewska\/Estera Drogicka and Jews whom Edward Malinowski helped.<\/p>\n Figure 1- Sheet of the case files of Edward Malinowski, son of Stanis\u0142aw \u2013 Denunciation to the<\/strong> Figure 2 \u2013 Page 1 of the verdict on Edward Malinowski\u2019s case<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Figure 3 \u2013 Page 2 of the verdict on Edward Malinowski\u2019s case<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n Figure 4 \u2013 Sheet of the case files of Edward Malinowski \u2013 transcript of the testimony made by<\/strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/rdi.org.pl\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/ksiazkaDalejJestNoc-e1610035232322.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/rdi.org.pl\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/EM.AGN_.1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
prosecutor\u2019s office<\/strong><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/rdi.org.pl\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/EM.AGN_.2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/rdi.org.pl\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/EM.AGN_.3.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/rdi.org.pl\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/EM.AGN_.4.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Maria Wi\u015bniewska\/Estera Drogicka. Front page. <\/strong><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/rdi.org.pl\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/EM.AGN_.5.jpg\")
<\/p>\n